Prevention of re-establishment of malaria: historical perspective and future prospects

dc.contributor.authorNasir, S. M. Ibraheem
dc.contributor.authorAmarasekara, Sachini
dc.contributor.authorWickremasinghe, Renu
dc.contributor.authorUdagama, Preethi
dc.contributor.authorFernando, Deepika
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-05T10:36:19Z
dc.date.available2021-06-05T10:36:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPrevention of re-establishment (POR) refers to the prevention of malaria outbreak/epidemic occurrence or preventing re-establishment of indigenous malaria in a malaria-free country. Understanding the effectiveness of the various strategies used for POR is, therefore, of vital importance to countries certified as “malaria-free” or to the countries to be thus certified in the near future. This review is based on extensive review of literature on both the POR strategies and elimination schemes of countries, (i) that have reached malaria-free status (e.g. Armenia, Mauritius, Sri Lanka), (ii) those that are reaching pre-elimination stage (e.g. South Korea), and (iii) countries at the control phase (e.g. India). History has clearly shown that poorly implemented POR programmes can result in deadly consequences (e.g. Sri Lanka); conversely, there are examples of robust POR programmes that have sustained malaria free status that can serve as examples to countries working toward elimination. Countries awaiting malaria elimination status should pre-plan their POR strategies. Malaria-free countries face the risk of resurgence mostly due to imported malaria cases; thus, a robust passenger screening programme and cross border collaborations are crucial in a POR setting. In addition, sustained vigilance, and continued funding for the national anti-malarial campaign programme and for related research is of vital importance for POR. With distinct intrinsic potential for malaria in each country, tailor-made POR programmes are built through continuous and robust epidemiological and entomological surveillance, particularly in countries such as Sri Lanka with increased receptivity and vulnerability for malaria transmission. In summary, across all five countries under scrutiny, common strengths of the POR programmes are (i) a multipronged approach, (ii) strong passive, active, and activated passive case detection, (iii) Indoor residual spraying (IRS), and (iv) health education/awareness programmes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the National Research Council (Grant No: 16-13) and the University of Sri Jayawardenapura (ASP/01/RE/MED/2017/41), Sri Lanka.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03527-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/5288
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMalaria Journalen_US
dc.subjectmalariaen_US
dc.subjecthistorical perspectiveen_US
dc.subjectfuture prospectsen_US
dc.titlePrevention of re-establishment of malaria: historical perspective and future prospectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
56.pdf
Size:
1.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: