Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorHanwella, Raveen
dc.contributor.authorSenanayake, Madhri
dc.contributor.authorDe Silva, Varuni
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-01T08:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground: Psychostimulants and non stimulants are effective in the treatment of ADHD. Efficacy of bot methylphenidate and atomoxetine has been established in placebo controlled trials. Direct comparison of efficacy is now possible due to availability of results from several head-to-head trials of these two medications. Methods: All published, randomized, open label or double blind trials, comparing efficacy of methylphenidate with atomoxetine, in treatment of ADHD in children, diagnosed using DSM-IV™ criteria were included. The outcome studied was ADHDRS-IVParent:Inv score. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size. Results: Nine randomized trials comparing methylphenidate and atomoxetine, with a total of 2762 participants were included. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in efficacy between methylphenidate and atomoxetine (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.26) (Z = 1.06, p = 0.29). Synthesis of data from eight trials found no significant difference in response rates (RR = 0.93 95% CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.49). Sub group analysis showed a significant standardized mean difference favouring OROS methylphenidate (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.53 (Z = 3.05, p < 0.002). Immediate release methylphenidate was not superior to atomoxetine (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.19-0.12) (Z = 0.46, p = 0.64). Excluding open label trials did not significantly alter the effect size (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI -0.04- 0.21) (Z = 1.27, p = 0.20). All-cause discontinuation was used as a measure of acceptability. There was no significant difference in all cause discontinuation between atomoxetine and methylphenidate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87- 1.71). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p = 0.002, I 2 = 67%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity to be due to the open label trials (p = 0.001, I 2 = 81%). Conclusions: In general atomoxetine and methylphenidate have comparable efficacy and equal acceptability in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. However OROS methylphenidate is more effective than atomoxetine and may be considered as first line treatment in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.
dc.identifier.citationHanwella, R., Senanayake, M., & De Silva, V. (2011). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 11, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-176
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-244x-11-176
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-176
dc.identifier.urihttps://archive.cmb.ac.lk/handle/70130/8249
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatry
dc.subjectMethylphenidate
dc.subjectOppositional Defiant Disorder
dc.subjectADHD Symptom
dc.subjectAtomoxetine
dc.subjectTeacher Rating
dc.titleComparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume11

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of.pdf
Size:
173.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections