Abstract:
This paper investigates the legal intricacies surrounding the removal and restitution of Lewke’s
Cannon from Kandy, an artifact in the Rijksmuseum since 1875 following its confiscation by
the Dutch during the 1765 conquest of Kandy, using the doctrinal research method. The
exploration unfolds against the backdrop of diverse legal frameworks that governed Sri Lanka
during the incident in 1765. The Dutch, asserting control, imposed Roman Dutch Law on
their territories. Kandyan Law, which governed the specific region of Kandy, vested ultimate
power in the King, designating royal properties, such as the Lewke’s Cannon, as expressions
of regal ownership. Roman Dutch Law, notably influenced by the Roman Principle of
Occupancy, had profound implications for international law concerning the acquisition of
war spoils. Concurrently, the field of Cultural Property Law emerged, reflecting a synthesis
of public, private, and international legal elements, underscored by ethical considerations
in preserving cultural assets. The study examines international legal conventions, including
the UNESCO Convention, UNIDROIT Convention, and the 1954 Hague Convention, that
shape the landscape for repatriating cultural property. Simultaneously, it evaluates Sri Lanka’s
domestic legal apparatus, revealing the inadequacies of the 1940 Antiquities Ordinance No. 9
and the 1988 Cultural Property Act No. 73 in addressing contemporary legal exigencies. The
conclusion navigates the complexities surrounding Sri Lanka’s inability to file a claim under...
