Abstract:
The horizontal application of fundamental rights in Sri Lanka crafted a legal culture where
basic human rights are protected only against state violations and nothing beyond. As a result,
fundamental rights violations by private individuals have escaped the purview of the legal
system highlighting a niche area which needs state regulations. The article explores whether
judicial recognition of constitutional delicts under the category of delictual activities would
contribute to closing the gap. The proposal is based on three main points of contention: First,
the paper makes the case that the vertical application of fundamental rights could fall under the
purview of delictual activities without the need for any legislative enactments authorising such
an action. Second, personal liability for compensation cases has been justified by fundamental
rights jurisprudence developed under the 1978 constitution as equitable. This article examines
why the same equitable principle cannot be applied to validate the vertical application of
fundamental rights before first instance courts. Thirdly, the article views the Sri Lankan Supreme
Court’s decision in Karunanayake and Others v. Mannaperuma Mohotti Appuhamilage (SC Appeal No.
130/15) as the testimony for the judicial thinking and desire to develop the Sri Lankan common
law in general and particularly for delictual actions as opposed to the colonial legal heritage of
Roman Dutch Law. The Mannaperuma judgement’s legal reasoning is based on distributive
justice and social engineering, which call for the law to be the catalyst...
