Constitution as a Living Document: An Analysis of Judicial Construction in Sri Lanka and India

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jeyakala, J.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-11-28T06:31:31Z
dc.date.available 2024-11-28T06:31:31Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation Jeyakala, J. (2024). Constitution as a Living Document: An Analysis of Judicial Construction in Sri Lanka and India. Proceedings: University of Colombo Annual Research Symposium 2024, p.132. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2815-0481
dc.identifier.uri http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/7426
dc.description.abstract The constitution is the fundamental law of a state. Sometimes, the constitution necessitates evolution through judicial interpretation to respond to the contemporary needs of the society. Traditionally, originalists argue that the meaning of the constitutional provisions is fixed and that should be applied in its original form. Whereas, living constitutionalists oppose the originalist view and argue that constitutional law can and should evolve in response to changing circumstances and values. Constitutional interpretation during the last few decades has evidenced a gradual evolution of the meaning of the constitution as a living document in Sri Lanka. Nevertheless, there are some judgements ... en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Constitutional Interpretation en_US
dc.subject Rationalism en_US
dc.subject Living Constitutionalism en_US
dc.subject Originalism en_US
dc.subject Constitutional Evolution en_US
dc.title Constitution as a Living Document: An Analysis of Judicial Construction in Sri Lanka and India en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account