dc.contributor.author |
Edirisinghe, C. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kailasapathy, Pavithra |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-02-14T15:46:40Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-02-14T15:46:40Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Edirisinghe, C. & Kailasapathy, P. (2021). Why do only some people blow the whistle? A multi-theoretical perspective. Sri Lankan Journal of Management, 26(1), 93-118 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6457 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
De George’s Theory of Whistle-blowing explains an individual’s whistle-
ϐ Ǥ ǡ
it does not adequately explain why only some people blow the whistle.
This theoretical paper proposes a framework combining the theories
of Principled Organizational Dissent, Resource Dependency, and Moral
Conation to address the theoretical gaps in De George’s Theory of Whistle-
Ǥ ǡ ϐ
mediate the relationships between personal principles, personal cost of
reporting, personal responsibility for reporting, evidence of wrongdoing
and whistle-blowing intention. Further, based on the Theory of Moral
Conation, this paper suggests that the moral conation capacities of
ǡ ϐ ǡ
ϐ Ǧ Ǥ
The main theoretical contribution of the paper is that it addresses three
theoretical gaps inherent in De George’s Theory of Whistle-blowing. The
proposed framework’s managerial implications include establishing
a supportive culture for implementing human resource management
systems which promote individual whistle-blowing behaviour. In addition,
this study opens up avenues for future research to use morality as a key
concept in studies related to whistle-blowing. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Whistle-blowing intention |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Personal cost of reporting |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Personal responsibility for reporting |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Evidence of wrongdoing |
en_US |
dc.title |
Why Do Only Some People Blow the Whistle? A Multi-Theoretical Perspective |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |