dc.contributor.author |
Jayamanne, I T |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ramanayake, K P A |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-11-30T03:31:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-11-30T03:31:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Jayamanne, I.T. and Ramanayake, K.P.A. (2021).” Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses”, Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 15(3) pp 477–488. https://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal/fullpaper/vol15issue3/ARTIKEL%2011%20[JAYAMANNE].pdf |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6304 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The population mean is often estimated using the sample mean with no consideration to the
design of the survey, the survey errors and biases. Although surveys are properly designed
to reduce errors, unit non-response and coverage errors are mostly unavoidable. Thus, non-
response adjustment for the sampling weights is essential when estimating the population mean.
A survey of Sri Lankan university graduates was conducted in 2016 for a random sample of Art
graduates who had graduated in 2012 in all state universities. This study aims to estimate the
mean waiting time for the first employment after graduation for all 2012 Arts graduates based
on these data. The response rate of the survey was 48% and it was noticed that the response rate
varied with university, gender and ethnicity of the graduates. The sampling weights were ad-
justed using the individual propensities and the class propensities determined by the propensity
adjustment score model to select the best non-response adjustment weights for the data. Next,
the final weight adjustment was done using post-stratification, raking and calibration using cen-
sus data that was available, taking university, ethnicity and gender as auxiliary variables. The
model with the individual propensity adjustment when calibrated using university and gender
cross-cell counts and marginal counts for ethnicity provided the smallest standard error for the
population mean. Finally, the mean waiting time for the first employment was estimated using
these adjusted weights as 15.19 months with a standard error of 0.65 |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
15(3); |
|
dc.subject |
calibration; post-stratification; propensity model; raking; trim weight |
en_US |
dc.title |
Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |