Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jayamanne, I T
dc.contributor.author Ramanayake, K P A
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-30T03:31:07Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-30T03:31:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Jayamanne, I.T. and Ramanayake, K.P.A. (2021).” Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses”, Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 15(3) pp 477–488. https://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal/fullpaper/vol15issue3/ARTIKEL%2011%20[JAYAMANNE].pdf en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6304
dc.description.abstract The population mean is often estimated using the sample mean with no consideration to the design of the survey, the survey errors and biases. Although surveys are properly designed to reduce errors, unit non-response and coverage errors are mostly unavoidable. Thus, non- response adjustment for the sampling weights is essential when estimating the population mean. A survey of Sri Lankan university graduates was conducted in 2016 for a random sample of Art graduates who had graduated in 2012 in all state universities. This study aims to estimate the mean waiting time for the first employment after graduation for all 2012 Arts graduates based on these data. The response rate of the survey was 48% and it was noticed that the response rate varied with university, gender and ethnicity of the graduates. The sampling weights were ad- justed using the individual propensities and the class propensities determined by the propensity adjustment score model to select the best non-response adjustment weights for the data. Next, the final weight adjustment was done using post-stratification, raking and calibration using cen- sus data that was available, taking university, ethnicity and gender as auxiliary variables. The model with the individual propensity adjustment when calibrated using university and gender cross-cell counts and marginal counts for ethnicity provided the smallest standard error for the population mean. Finally, the mean waiting time for the first employment was estimated using these adjusted weights as 15.19 months with a standard error of 0.65 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 15(3);
dc.subject calibration; post-stratification; propensity model; raking; trim weight en_US
dc.title Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account