Mid-trial design reviews for sequential clinical trials

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Whitehead, J
dc.contributor.author Whitehead, A
dc.contributor.author Todd, S
dc.contributor.author Bolland, K.M.
dc.contributor.author Sooriyarachchi, M.R.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-07T03:29:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-07T03:29:06Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier.citation Whitehead, J. Whitehead, A., Todd, S., Bolland, K.M., and Sooriyarachchi, M.R. Mid-trial design reviews for sequential clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine 20, 165-176, 2001 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/5487
dc.description.abstract When sequential clinical trials are conducted by plotting a statistic measuring treatment di erence against another measuring information, power is guaranteed regardless of nuisance parameters. However, values need to be assigned to nuisance parameters in order to gain an impression of the sample size distribution. Each interim analysis provides an opportunity to re-evaluate the relationship between sample size and information. In this paper we discuss such mid-trial design reviews. In the special cases of trials with a relatively short recruitment phase followed by a longer period of follow-up, and of normally distributed responses, mid- trial design reviews are particularly important. Examples are given of the various situations considered, and extensive simulations are reported demonstrating the validity of the review procedure in the case of normally distributed responses. Copyright ? 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship ACU en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.title Mid-trial design reviews for sequential clinical trials en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account