dc.contributor.author |
Whitehead, J |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Whitehead, A |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Todd, S |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bolland, K.M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sooriyarachchi, M.R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-07-07T03:29:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-07-07T03:29:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2001 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Whitehead, J. Whitehead, A., Todd, S., Bolland, K.M., and Sooriyarachchi, M.R. Mid-trial design reviews for sequential clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine 20, 165-176, 2001 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/5487 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
When sequential clinical trials are conducted by plotting a statistic measuring treatment di erence against
another measuring information, power is guaranteed regardless of nuisance parameters. However, values need
to be assigned to nuisance parameters in order to gain an impression of the sample size distribution. Each
interim analysis provides an opportunity to re-evaluate the relationship between sample size and information.
In this paper we discuss such mid-trial design reviews. In the special cases of trials with a relatively short
recruitment phase followed by a longer period of follow-up, and of normally distributed responses, mid-
trial design reviews are particularly important. Examples are given of the various situations considered, and
extensive simulations are reported demonstrating the validity of the review procedure in the case of normally
distributed responses. Copyright ? 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
ACU |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Wiley |
en_US |
dc.title |
Mid-trial design reviews for sequential clinical trials |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |