Abstract:
Abstract:“Mass Media with its sixty plus years history and its perceived capability to directly affect
large audience has enormous capacity to communicate for and about development. Especially,
Television has been continuously evolving as the most „massive‟ of the media in terms of reach, time
spent and popularity, has barely changed over thirty years and it add all the time to its global
audience” (Mc Quail, 2010: 35) Wilkins (2008) opines that participation ,of the stakeholders,
particularly the marginalized communities , in the developmental process is mandatory in a
democratic system. Conceptualizations and justifications for participatory development come under
a comprehensive spectrum spanning from recognition of the process to the consequences resulted
upon the society. Development practitioners, professionals and governments all over the world have
been exploring ways to maximize participation of beneficiary communities in the process as one of
the key factors contributing to success. Participation is a tool that helps development planners to
utilize indigenous skills of the communities in the process and integrate new knowledge into the
communities as well. Some development institutions consider participation is a one-off thing that
occurs in the mid of the total process. participation and mobilization can be promoted as a part of
media coverage. Wilkins (2008) discusses about the way media communicates on development,
questioning the way that social change projects articulate assumptions about problems, solutions, and
communities while emphasizing that the ongoing discussion on communicating about development
contribute towards improving strategies for communication for development. Hence this research
study will examine how the documentary genre in television media frame issues pertaining to
poverty and how producers in Sri Lankan television industry identify their role within the context of
poverty; what factors influence the television to discuss poverty among rural poor. The findings may
conclude whether television has been utilized fully for the benefit of rural community and to what
extent the rural poverty is discussed in that media, with suggestions to improve the television output
to reduce the knowledge gaps among rural poor, improve participation and reduce rural poverty.
