Abstract:
Implementation of the death penalty is a contemporary issue in most parts of the universe. It lies at the heart
of retributory justice and is still practiced by a significant part of the globe. While many countries have
abolished the death penalty either de jure or de facto, there are still several arguments both for and against the
implementation of the death penalty. Regarding these arguments it then becomes important to see whether
there is any merit in the jurisprudential arguments specially from the natural law and positivistic schools of
legal thought. The proponents of natural law who base their arguments on the connection of law and morality
both argue for and against the death penalty and, proponents of the positivistic school are strongly adamant
about the validity of the implementation of the death penalty. In the above back drop this paper examines the
ideas put forward by Lon Fuller and John Finnis regarding the natural law thinking and, the ideas of
H.L.A. Hart and Hans Kelson from the positivistic perspective.
