Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Poisoning due to deliberate self-harm with the seeds of yellow
oleander (Thevetia peruviana) results in significant morbidity and mortality each
year in South Asia. Yellow oleander seeds contain highly toxic cardiac glycosides
including thevetins A and B and neriifolin. A wide variety of bradyarrhythmias
and tachyarrhythmias occur following ingestion. Important epidemiological and
clinical differences exist between poisoning due to yellow oleander and digoxin;
yellow oleander poisoning is commonly seen in younger patients without
preexisting illness or comorbidity. Assessment and initial management. Initial
assessment and management is similar to other poisonings. No definite criteria
are available for risk stratification. Continuous ECG monitoring for at least 24
h is necessary to detect arrhythmias; longer monitoring is appropriate in
patients with severe poisoning. Supportive care. Correction of dehydration with
normal saline is necessary, and antiemetics are used to control severe vomiting.
Electrolytes. Hypokalemia worsens toxicity due to digitalis glycosides, and
hyperkalemia is life-threatening. Both must be corrected. Hyperkalemia is due to
extracellular shift of potassium rather than an increase in total body potassium
and is best treated with insulin-dextrose infusion. Intravenous calcium increases
the risk of cardiac arrhythmias and is not recommended in treating hyperkalemia.
Oral or rectal administration of sodium polystyrene sulfonate resin may result in
hypokalemia when used together with digoxin-specific antibody fragments. Unlike
digoxin toxicity, serum magnesium concentrations are less likely to be affected
in yellow oleander poisoning. The effect of magnesium concentrations on toxicity
and outcome is not known. Hypomagnesaemia should be corrected as it can worsen
cardiac glycoside toxicity. Gastric decontamination. The place of emesis
induction and gastric lavage has not been investigated, although they are used in
practice. Gastric decontamination by the use of single dose and multiple doses of
activated charcoal has been evaluated in two randomized controlled trials, with
contradictory results. Methodological differences (severity of poisoning in
recruited patients, duration of treatment, compliance) between the two trials,
together with differences in mortality rates in control groups, have led to much
controversy. No firm recommendation for or against the use of multiple doses of
activated charcoal can be made at present, and further studies are needed.
Single-dose activated charcoal is probably beneficial. Activated charcoal is
clearly safe. Arrhythmia management. Bradyarrhythmias are commonly managed with
atropine, isoprenaline, and temporary cardiac pacing in severe cases, although
without trial evidence of survival benefit, or adequate evaluation of possible
risks. Accelerating the heart rate with atropine or beta-adrenergic agents
theoretically increases the risk of tachyarrhythmias, and it has been claimed
that atropine increases tachyarrhythmic deaths. Further studies are required.
Tachyarrhythmias have a poor prognosis and are more difficult to treat. Lidocaine
is the preferred antiarrhythmic; the role of intravenous magnesium is uncertain.
Digoxin-specific antibody fragments. Digoxin-specific antibody fragments are
effective in reverting life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias; prospective
observational studies show a beneficial effect on mortality. High cost and lack
of availability limit the widespread use of digoxin-specific antibody fragments
in developing countries. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin-specific antibody fragments remain
the only proven therapy for yellow oleander poisoning. Further studies are needed
to determine the place of activated charcoal, the benefits or risks of atropine
and isoprenaline, the place and choice of antiarrhythmics, and the effect of
intravenous magnesium in yellow oleander poisoning.