“Underserved” or “Undeserved”? A study on the identity formation of the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers in Colombo

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Korala, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-05T10:57:02Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-05T10:57:02Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Arts, University of Colombo, November 2017 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/4545
dc.description.abstract In the urbanization of the city of Colombo, ‘slums’ and ‘shanties’ have attracted the attention of state authorities since the British colonial period. Pre- and post- Independence town planning proposals and urban development plans have identified ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers as people who face material and physical problems related to sanitation, transportation etc., and the authorities have initiated many projects to solve these problems. Nevertheless, the identity ascribed to them by society as socially unacceptable, still prevails. This study aims to assess the identity formation of ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers within policy frameworks and society, in terms of being embedded in the urban development discourse. The paper has three research questions: (a) How has the state constructed the identity of the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers within urban development planning? (b) How has society constructed the identity of the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers? (c) Why have the state’s policy initiatives to upgrade the living conditions of the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers failed to change their socially constructed identity? The desk research was conducted and Laclau’s and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory was used to analyse both the primary and secondary sources. Policy papers, Government Acts, policy briefs, and secondary sources, as well as reports by non-governmental organizations and journal articles on the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ development projects were used to identify and examine how the two different types of identities have been attributed to ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers by the state and by society. The research contends that a contradiction between the two different identities formed by the state and by society regarding the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers has complicated their identity within society. It also argues that the more ‘liberal’ terms used to designate ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers have only been limited to policy papers and have not penetrated intosociety through the projects initiated by these particular policy proposals. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Colombo en_US
dc.subject slum, shanty, identity, discourse theory, development policy en_US
dc.title “Underserved” or “Undeserved”? A study on the identity formation of the ‘slum’ and ‘shanty’ dwellers in Colombo en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account