Abstract:
Language policy can be defined as a law, rules or precepts designed to bring about
language change, encoded in mechanisms of language planning undertaken by
governments, schools or other institutional bodies (Smitherman 2000). In countries
with a history of ethnic conflict in which language rights or language use has been a
contributing factor, language policies can serve to divide or unite a nation. Sri Lanka is
no exception, having been subjected to a succession of short-sighted, self-serving
language policy decisions over the last 50 years. The country's current (pre-war)
Constitution outlines Sri Lanka's language policy in Chapter IV, affording Sinhala and
Tamil the status of both Official and National Languages, while English is termed the
link language. In addition to this, the post-war Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission's (LLRC) Report contains recommendations on the directions and goals
of future language policies and also - perhaps for the first time - an acknowledgment
and recognition of the existence of problems related to language use/non-use. The
objective of this paper is to analyse the recommendations pertaining to language use as
set out in the LLRC's Report (2011) from the perspective of language as a tool of
reconciliation. These recommendations encompass four major areas - education,
administration, identity/culture and interpersonal communication. Of these, the last two
represent a new departure into volatile yet crucially important areas of the Sri Lankan
psyche that have not been previously addressed by language planners or policy makers.
For instance, the Report proposes that Sinhala and Tamil speakers be brought closer
through linguistic and cultural affinities in each other's language and literatures, rather
than through English as a "link language" as given in the Constitution. The paper
concludes by discussing the challenges of using language as a tool of reconciliation,
such as ideological shifts, changes in beliefs and identities and consciousness raising,
drawing from the experiences of diverse countries such as South Africa, Taiwan and
Australia, which have adopted similar methods of conflict resolution.
