Abstract:
This study was carried out to determine the role of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to
diagnose malaria infections in the Anuradhapura district of Sri Lanka. The study
population comprised 390 persons. This included 250 symptomatic individuals (having
signs and symptoms suggestive of malaria) attending medical institutions and 140
asymptomatic individuals attending mobile malaria clinics. All were screened for the
presence of malaria parasites using microscopy and PCR. The PCR method used was
malaria genus and species-specific. Malaria infections were detected in 25% of this total
population (99 out of 390) screened by PCR; 21.5 % with Plasmodium vivax, 2% with P.
falciparum and 1.5% with mixed infections of P. falciparum and P. vivax. Considering the
PCR diagnosis as the gold standard (having 100% sensitivity and specificity), microscopy
showed a sensitivity of only 85% with a specificity of 100%. Thus microscopy failed to
detect 15% of infections (15 out of 99) that were positive by the PCR method. Out of
these 15 individuals who were negative on microscopy (but positive on PCR), 13
symptomatic individuals were detected from medical institutions and the other two were
asymptomatic individuals who were from the mobile malaria clinics. This study illustrates
the presence of a population of individuals with symptomatic and asymptomatic malaria
who could remain undetected through microscopy. Should only microscopy be used as
the sole diagnostic method, it would lead to malaria misdiagnosis and therefore the lack
of anti-malaria treatment for the patients with malaria. These results therefore suggest the
suitability of using PCR diagnosis at least in a subpopulation to overcome the possibility
of misdiagnosis. Such inclusion of PCR diagnosis for malaria detection would lead to
better patient management and ultimately better malaria control
