dc.description.abstract |
In Sri Lanka, the contribution of the arts towards conflict studies and peacebuilding is rarely
acknowledged, and many scholars and conflict resolution activists seem to exclude this area
consciously. While all forms of the arts have the potential of making an impact on conflict
peacebuilding, theatre can be highlighted as effective as any other form of art because
''theatre is (also) a form of knowledge; it should and can be means of transforming society"
(Boal 2001 :xx). Moreover, Boal (1979:7) states that "drama is practically effective in
changing attitude because it holds the real experiences of its participants in mind at the same
time that it creates an imagined world in which characters are engaged in struggling with the
central paradox".
The treatment of this research is twofold. Introductorily, the study views, in brief, what
peacebuilding is; amongst a myriad of definitions that are transient and influx some relatively
important theorists are discussed. Next, the theoretical backdrop to applied theatre is
examined so that the dynamics of applied theatre could be examined in detail in the textual
analysis. Here, theatre is recognized as a successful mode of building and rekindling
memories: memories help people to build identities, restructure them, give them the drive
and construct their politics. Then, in the first part of the study, the research records the trends
in theatre in Sri Lanka and its receptiveness towards "peacebuilding" by looking at textual
evidence in some of the plays that have been written based on the issue of the ethnic conflict
in Sri Lanka.
IV
Initially,whenobservingthegeneraltrendof theatreit is clearthattheatrein Sri Lankais
divided on linguistic grounds. While Tamil theatre is found only in the Tamil spoken north
and in the diaspora, Sinh ala plays can be found touring throughout the island and English
plays are found mainly in Colombo and Kandy. Although textual evidence of Tamil plays
are not included in the study, partially due to time restrictions and the author's inability to
understand the language, the Sinhala .and English plays that have been presented in the
mainstream theatre from 1998-2008 are examined extensively in terms of their thematic
context; the ethnic conflict. In the process the author identifies that there are general shifts in
terms of theatre trends in Sri Lanka: English theatre embodies a paradigm shift towards
'boulevard theatre' mode and in Sinhala theatre there is a significant decline in the numbers
being produced and the actors seem to shift from theatre to small screen productions.
Out of the mainstream Sinhala and English mainstream theatre productions five plays are
selected and the characterisation, plot and genre are examined in order to determine their
ability to build peace through perspective change. Both the Sinhala plays have been penned
by Visakesa Chandrasekaram and they engage with various issues dealing with the ethnic
conflict. While Thahanam Adaviya deals mainly with the psyche and the making of an LTIE
suicide bomber, Sehesi Danawwa deals with the futility of segregation according to ethnic
identity. The three EngLish plays examined in this study are MacIntyre's Rasanayagam's
Last Riot and He Still Comes from Jaffna and Delon Weerasinghe's Blood is thicker than
Water. MacIntyre's Rasanayagam's last Riot, is set in the heat of 1983 Ju1y pogrom where
the dilemmas of Sita Fernando, an English speaking Tamil married to a Sinhalese, and the
dynamics of her relationship with her husband and her own people are explored. The plot
v
gets thicker as Phillip's university friend Rasanayagam, a Jaffna Tamil residing in Colombo,
exiles in the Fernando household in Wellawatte to escape the persecutions of the Sinhalese
mobs that go on a killing spree. Tamil nationalism and ethnic identity cause the death of
Rasanayagam and the migration of Fernandos mark a rejection of discrimination based on
ethnic grounds. In He Still Comes from Jaffna, comedy is juxtaposed with human tragedy and
various issues about migrant (internal as well as external) Tamils, the loss of their homeland,
the meaninglessness of racial identity, violence and terror incited by the LTIE and issues
relating to social class are discussed with natural poignancy. Delon Weerasinghe's Blood is
Thicker than Water is a rendering of corruptive party politics in the country and how a
disabled soldier donned with the mantle of 'war hero' becomes a victim of a devious
politician. Moreover, Major Suresh's realization about the futility of war coupled with his
frustration of being disabled creates a pathological pessimist who is critical of the war
machine. Here too, the value of ethnic identity is discussed in detail and with the death of
Major Suresh at a political rally the play foregrounds the brutality of politics, perhaps worse
than the war itself.
The second part of this study considers Checkpoint- Three Strangely Normal Plays directed
by Ruwanthi de Chickera (performed from 1st -5th of September 2006) as a case study; the
actions, reactions and suggestions that took place in the theatre are recorded. Special focus
has been given to the "forum theatre" performance that was built around the ethnic conflict,
which was acted on three days, and the success or failure of the performance in making an
impact on the audience is devised along the social and cultural dimensions of the sample. It
was evident that the 'classic realist model' that the Sri Lankan audiences are used to
VI
impinges on the vitality of forum theatre practices. Further, the envisioning of forum theatre
as a mode of pure entertainment fundamentally allows the audience to trivialise the situation
and turn it into a 'spectacle'. Moreover, the study analyses the Checkpoint's deviation from
'theatre of the oppressed' and the pros and cons relating to this deviation. Consequently, the
study highlights the short-term effectiveness of such mechanisms that can be remedied by
continual theatre practices such as 'street theatre' and if practiced regularly they can be
synergised with conventional peacebuilding tools |
|