dc.description.abstract |
During the early years of British rule, by the proclamation of 23rd September 1799, the
continued operation of the Thesawalamai was guaranteed. In the present context, the
Constitution of 19781 has guaranteed the continued operation of all existing written and
unwritten laws after the enactment of the Constitution. Accordingly, Tamil inhabitants of
the Northern Province continue to be governed by the Thesawalamai.
Though Thesawalamai has been influenced by many laws, this research will focus on the
influence of Roman Dutch Law and Hindu Law.Two waves of immigrants came to Sri
Lanka from India.The first immigrants called Malabar came from Malabar Coast. They
followed a matriarchal life system.The second wave of immigrants came from
Coromandel Coast and with the advent of Arychakravaty, the Hindu Law was introduced.
They followed a patriarchal life system.
The Dutch first codified the customs of Jaffna people and the British codified the
Thesawalamai by the Regulation of 1806. In the early days of the British rule the
provisions of the Thesawalamai Code was elucidated and supplemented by reference to
Hindu Law, but later this policy underwent a change and when customary law was silent,
the Roman Dutch law was applied. Since this Code does not provide for all matters in
relation to the subject of marriage, the Tamils who are subjected to Thesawalamai are
governed by the General Law of marriage in related to certain elements of marriage.
However, the Code addresses the issues of matrimonial property. The case law establishes
that Tamils governed by the Thesawalamai can contract a valid customary marriage.2 Yet
the provisions relating to age and prohibited relationships in the General Law cannot be
circumvented by such a customary marriage.
The earlier position in Hindu Law was that there was no prohibition against a person
having more than one wife. Children born to different wives were treated as legitimate.
Only a child born to a concubine was treated as an illegitimate child. There is evidence to
suggest that a similar practice prevailed in Jaffna during the Dutch period3.
In the post-Vedic periods, Hinduism rejected the notion of polygamy and it is now
considered as immoral. Furthermore, modern laws in relation to family emphasize that
spouses must not marry during the subsistence of a valid marriage |
|