dc.contributor.author |
Dissanayake, V.H.W. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Morgan, L. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Pipkin, F.B. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vathanan, V. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Premaratne, S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jayasekara, R.W. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Seneviratne, H.R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-02-29T06:09:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-02-29T06:09:15Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 111, Issue 5, May 2004, Pages 491-494 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/2009 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In many parts of the developing world, the urine protein heat coagulation test is routinely used to screen for proteinuria in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to determine whether ≥1+ on a standardised heat coagulation test reliably detects significant proteinuria and to compare it with the dipstick test for urinary protein. Heat coagulation test, dipstick test and 24-hour urine protein excretion results of 102 women were compared. ≥1+ on heat coagulation test is as sensitive and specific as ≥2+ on the dipstick test in detecting proteinuria of ≥500 mg/day. The heat coagulation test, however, is less sensitive than ≥1+ on dipstick in detecting lesser degrees of proteinuria. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.title |
The urine protein heat coagulation test - A useful screening test for proteinuria in pregnancy in developing countries: A method validation study |
en_US |
dc.type |
Journal abstract |
en_US |