Assessment of Psychometric Properties of a Modified PHEEM Questionnaire

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gooneratne, I.K.
dc.contributor.author Munasinghe, S.R.
dc.contributor.author Siriwardena, C.
dc.contributor.author Olupeliyawa, A.M.
dc.contributor.author Karunathilake, I.M.K.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-10-04T10:28:37Z
dc.date.available 2011-10-04T10:28:37Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.citation Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008;37:993-7 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/141
dc.description.abstract Background: An effective tool in analysing the learning environment, customised to the Sri Lankan setting, is vital for the assessment and delivery of quality healthcare training of preregistration house officers. Such a tool should be reliable and valid. We assessed psychometric properties such as internal reliability and construct validity of a modified version of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM). Materials and Methods: A modified PHEEM questionnaire customised to the Sri Lankan context was developed in accordance to the Sri Lanka Medical Council guidelines. The questionnaire was distributed to all interns at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo North Teaching Hospital and Wathupitiwala Base Hospital during a calendar year (n = 100, response rate = 86%). Internal reliability and construct validity of the inventory were assessed by using Cronbach’s alpha and exploratory factor analysis respectively as statistical methods. Results: PHEEM consists of 3 subscales: perceptions of autonomy, social support and teaching, which are factors perceived to be influencing the educational environment. This administration demonstrated high internal reliability as reflected by a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.84. Exploratory factor analysis identified 12 factors with eigenvalue >1. However, the first factor had an eigenvalue of 6.7 (accounting for 19.7% of variance), while the rest had eigenvalues < 2.5. These results suggest a single predictive factor and thus a one-dimensional scale as opposed to the three-dimensional scale which is used in the current questionnaire. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of this tool reflect a high degree of internal reliability in assessing the educational environment of intern doctors in Sri Lanka. It is possible that the clinical educational environment is collectively represented as a single dimension. This may be due to the complex interplay between individual items in the questionnaire. Therefore the psychometric properties do not justify the interpretation of the educational environment through specified subscales. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Assessment of Psychometric Properties of a Modified PHEEM Questionnaire en_US
dc.type Journal full-text en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account