Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/740Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chandrasena, T.G.A.N | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-12-05T09:04:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-12-05T09:04:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | MD (Medical Microbiology) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/740 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The objectives were firstly to evaluate a rapid format ICT card test (ICT diagnostics Australia) for filariasis in the diagnosis of bancroftain filariasis and to compare its sensitivity, specificity and cost effectiveness with TBF ( standard survey tool) and secondly to investigate any association between antigenaemia, microfilaraemia and clinical manifestations. As a screening tool ICT appears to be effective (both sensitive and specific) but not cost effective for routine mass surveillance in Sri Lanka. Both ICT and NMF were positive in only 40 per cent of individuals with features suggestive of clinical filariasis | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of methods for diagnosis of bancroftion filariasis | en_US |
| dc.type | Research abstract | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Masters Theses - Postgraduate Institute of Medicine | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.