Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6304
Title: Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses
Authors: Jayamanne, I T
Ramanayake, K P A
Keywords: calibration; post-stratification; propensity model; raking; trim weight
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences
Citation: Jayamanne, I.T. and Ramanayake, K.P.A. (2021).” Population Mean Estimation Using Weight Adjustment for Unit Non-Responses”, Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 15(3) pp 477–488. https://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal/fullpaper/vol15issue3/ARTIKEL%2011%20[JAYAMANNE].pdf
Series/Report no.: 15(3);
Abstract: The population mean is often estimated using the sample mean with no consideration to the design of the survey, the survey errors and biases. Although surveys are properly designed to reduce errors, unit non-response and coverage errors are mostly unavoidable. Thus, non- response adjustment for the sampling weights is essential when estimating the population mean. A survey of Sri Lankan university graduates was conducted in 2016 for a random sample of Art graduates who had graduated in 2012 in all state universities. This study aims to estimate the mean waiting time for the first employment after graduation for all 2012 Arts graduates based on these data. The response rate of the survey was 48% and it was noticed that the response rate varied with university, gender and ethnicity of the graduates. The sampling weights were ad- justed using the individual propensities and the class propensities determined by the propensity adjustment score model to select the best non-response adjustment weights for the data. Next, the final weight adjustment was done using post-stratification, raking and calibration using cen- sus data that was available, taking university, ethnicity and gender as auxiliary variables. The model with the individual propensity adjustment when calibrated using university and gender cross-cell counts and marginal counts for ethnicity provided the smallest standard error for the population mean. Finally, the mean waiting time for the first employment was estimated using these adjusted weights as 15.19 months with a standard error of 0.65
URI: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/6304
Appears in Collections:Department of Statistics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ARTIKEL 11 [JAYAMANNE].pdf978.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.