Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAriaratnam, C. A.-
dc.contributor.authorSjöström, L.-
dc.contributor.authorRaziek, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorAbeyasinghe, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKularatne, M.-
dc.contributor.authorArachchi, R. K.-
dc.contributor.authorWarrell, D. A.-
dc.identifier.citationAriaratnam, C. A., Sjöström, L., Raziek, Z., Abeyasinghe, S., Kularatne, M., Arachchi, R. K., ... & Warrell, D. A. (2001). An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii). Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 95(1), 74-80.en_US
dc.descriptionTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene: 2001; 95(1); 74-80p.en_US
dc.description.abstractRussell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in Sri Lanka. In a study in 1985, Haffkine equine polyspecific antivenom in doses up to 20 g proved ineffective in clearing antigenaemia and caused a high incidence of anaphylactoid reactions. A new, monospecific ovine Fabantivenom (PolongaTAb™) has been developed against the venom of Sri Lankan Russell's viper and, to assess its safety and efficacy, we carried out (in 1997) an open, randomized comparison of this with the Hafikine antivenom currently in use in the country. Patients with systemic envenoming following Russell's viper bite were randomized to receive an initial intravenous dose of either 1 g of PolongaTAb (n = 23) or 10g of Haffkine antivenom (n = 20). One dose of PolongaTAb permanently restored blood coagulability in only 9 (41%) of 22 patients and 13 needed repeated doses, whereas the majority (1420; 70%) had restored coagulability after 1 dose of Haffkine antivenom. There was a tendency towards more rapid resolution of local swelling and systemic manifestations in the Hafifkine group. Venom antigenaemia was eliminated more quickly in the Haffkine group and ovine Fab was cleared from the circulation more rapidly than equine F(ab′)2. To evaluate safety, patients were closely observed for adverse reactions. Following a severe reaction with Haffkine antivenom all subsequent patients in this group were treated prophylactically with hydrocortisone and chlorpheniramine. Despite this, the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the Haffkine group compared with the PolongaTAb group (81% compared with 48%) and 4 patients had a severe anaphylactic reaction in the former group. In conclusion, the new antivenom is safer than Haffkine antivenom but, to avoid repeated doses, an initial dose higher than 1 g is needed in the treatment of Sri Lankan Russell's viper envenoming. The safety of this larger dose is the subject of further studies.en_US
dc.subjectDaboia russeliien_US
dc.subjectadverse reactionsen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectclinical trialen_US
dc.subjectSri Lankaen_US
dc.titleAn open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for thetreatment of envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii)en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles (local / International)

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.