Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/5104
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSlomanson, William R.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T06:43:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-08T06:43:41Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Legal Education, Volume 64, Number 1 (August 2014)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/70130/5104-
dc.description.abstractThose who thumb the pages of this journal constantly assess why they teach the way they do. They tend not to embrace talismanic explanations of what does and does not work.1 They are instead hunter-gatherers who pursue the many paths leading to what works for them. Perhaps the best they can do is to constantly assess, and reassess, their understanding of how their students learn,2 and what constitutes effective teaching.3 This essay thus addresses one academy member’s seismic shift, after 36 years of traditional Socratic and Problem Method teaching, to a blended learning environment. I sensed that it was time to either retire, or pursue more active learning techniques.4 My first step on this journey was to articulate learningen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleBlended Learning: A Flipped Classroom Experimenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Blended Learning

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Blended Learning_ A Flipped Classroom Experiment.pdf96.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.