Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/4563
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authoradmakumara, S.C.-
dc.contributor.authorJayarathne, K.L.S.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T10:59:08Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-03T10:59:08Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Arts, University of Colombo, November 2017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/4563-
dc.description.abstractScholars who study regional affairs have mostly focused on both materially- and ideationally-oriented analyses while concentrating primarily on their institutional dimensions. Existing literature on a wide range of examples from regional organizations and their institutional practices suggests that normative engagements have become increasingly important for regional affairs. Somehow, little attention has been paid to systematically analysing distinct and patterned normative practices that have been embedded in regional organizations. Therefore, it is important to explore such normative practices adopted by regional entities through a contextual and systematic academic inquiry. This involves investigating how regions regulate the behavior of their members by adopting normative frameworks and what patterns and distinct features are identifiable from such practices. In this context, the ‘ASEAN Way’ attributed to the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) offers useful insights to understand how regions have been distinctively shaped and regulated by normative frameworks. Specifically, the ‘ASEAN Way’ is a unique style of conducting regional affairs and it can be broadly understood as a code of conduct for states to interact with each other and make decisions based on consultations and consensus. In other words, the ‘ASEAN Way’ is a normative process of conducting interactions through which the existing political tension, mistrust, and historical confrontations among ASEAN members are strategically overlooked by informal and flexible institutional procedures. Therefore, this paper argues that the ‘ASEAN Way’ can be treated as a distinct model of conducting regional affairs and has important implications for other regional organizations to enhance their normative practices.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Colomboen_US
dc.subjectASEAN, ‘ASEAN Way’, normative framework, consensus buildingen_US
dc.titleNormative behavior in regional affairs: A conceptual study on the ‘ASEAN Way’en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Arts (Humanities &Social Sciences)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ART37.pdf1.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.