Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/3506
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerera, J.
dc.contributor.authorWithana, N.
dc.contributor.authorSeneviratne, H.R.
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-28T05:28:12Z
dc.date.available2012-12-28T05:28:12Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citationThe Ceylon Journal of Medical Science. Vol. 39 (2) 1996, pp. 69-73en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/3506-
dc.description.abstractIn a case control study of 426 unselected deliveries at the De Soysa Hospital for Women, 85 (20%) infants had conjunctivitis. Chlamydia species (spp) and viruses were not detected. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest pathogen isolated and was detected in 47oh of cases. Klebsiella spp was isolated from Z7oh. Pseudomonas spp, Streptococcus oiridana and coliform isolation rates were not significantly different to that of controls, although significantly higher counts of bacteria were found in the cases. Therefore it would be more useful to the clinician if the taboratory report indicated the severity of infection. Only 51% of the isolates were sensitive to the conventionally used antibiotic, chloramphenicol. Treatment with saline washes appear to be sufficient in the first few days of the illness as there is spontaneous resolution of clinical appearance within 48-72 hr in a majority of patients.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleNeonatal conjunctivitis : aetiology, diagnosis and treatmenten_US
dc.typeJournal full-texten_US
Appears in Collections:Ceylon Journal of Medical Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Neonatal conjunctivis.pdf3.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.