Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/2009
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDissanayake, V.H.W.-
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, L.-
dc.contributor.authorPipkin, F.B.-
dc.contributor.authorVathanan, V.-
dc.contributor.authorPremaratne, S.-
dc.contributor.authorJayasekara, R.W.-
dc.contributor.authorSeneviratne, H.R.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-29T06:09:15Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-29T06:09:15Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 111, Issue 5, May 2004, Pages 491-494en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.cmb.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/70130/2009-
dc.description.abstractIn many parts of the developing world, the urine protein heat coagulation test is routinely used to screen for proteinuria in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to determine whether ≥1+ on a standardised heat coagulation test reliably detects significant proteinuria and to compare it with the dipstick test for urinary protein. Heat coagulation test, dipstick test and 24-hour urine protein excretion results of 102 women were compared. ≥1+ on heat coagulation test is as sensitive and specific as ≥2+ on the dipstick test in detecting proteinuria of ≥500 mg/day. The heat coagulation test, however, is less sensitive than ≥1+ on dipstick in detecting lesser degrees of proteinuria.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleThe urine protein heat coagulation test - A useful screening test for proteinuria in pregnancy in developing countries: A method validation studyen_US
dc.typeJournal abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Anatomy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.pdf44.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.